Model for electronuclear interactions

Dear FLUKA experts!
Up to now you have all been of great help to me. I have encountered an interesting result in my simulations and would like to seek your expertise once again.
Just to repeat what I am doing: I am simulating an electron beam of 3.2GeV imping on a tungsten target (0.1X0 thickness). The output data I process with a c++ program and plot the results using root histograms.
I will include my mgdraw_empty.f user routine and also my myfluka.inp files as well as the processing program called plotting.cc for you to understand what I am doing.
mgdraw_empty.f (11.5 KB)
myfluka.inp (1.1 KB)
plotting.cc (14.2 KB)

As a study for the experiment I am working on, the angular distributions of outgoing hadrons are very important. Thus I am using the momenta of the outgoing hadrons of electronuclear interactions (ICODE=101) to determine their angles. Intuitively an isotropic distribution of theta for radiated hadrons of electronuclear interactions with small beam energies (close to 0GeV) makes sense. For larger energies I would assume the shape to change and shift towards smaller angles (due to the large boost in z-direction coming from the beam particle).
If I take different beam energies in FLUKA this result cannot be seen. For beam energies of 3.2GeV, 30GeV and 300GeV the theta distribution shifts only very vaguely contrary to what I would think would happen. The red sine in the plots indicates the isotropic sine-distribution.


My intuitive expectation would look more like this (simple python simulation of isotropic distributed points on sphere with Lorentz boost along z axis):

Since I have no access to the source code and do not know how FLUKA simulates and handles these hadrons from electronuclear interactions, I would be happy for any help or explanation!
Thanks in advance,
Laney Klipphahn

As clearly shown in one of the first posts on this matter, the electron preserves almost entirely its energy/momentum most of the times, while the target nucleus absorbs a much softer virtual photon. Hence your boost expectation/assumption does not hold. You may want to filter the events with large momentum transfer and analyze only those.

1 Like

Thanks for your reply, it has helped a lot!